Encryption will become an increasing presence in cybercrimes
for a number of reasons. Encryption is an excellent method for protecting data
from prying eyes. In most cases corporations will use encryption to protect
data from criminals, but now criminals are implementing encryption to cover
their tracks and hide illegal material such as child pornography and copyright
infringing material. Encrypted data is extremely difficult to decipher without
a decryption key, and the technical means to do so is well beyond most law
enforcement resources.
Current laws do not include any provisions forcing
individuals to release their decryption keys or passwords. In some landmark
cases, judges have either mandated individuals to give up their passwords, or
exclude encrypted data from incriminating evidence. In most cases, defendants
have claimed the Fifth Amendment, claiming that being forced to give up their
encryption key effectively incriminates themselves, which is unconstitutional.
In other regions around the globe, some governments have implemented “mandatory
disclosure laws”, which forces an individual under law to decrypt their data as
evidence. In the In re Boucher case in Vermont (United States District Court
for the District of Vermont, 2009), the District Court overturned a
Magistrate’s decision to uphold the Fifth Amendment by claiming Boucher was
only required to reveal the unencrypted contents of the laptop hard drive, not
reveal his decryption key. Incriminating evidence was discovered and he was
sentenced in 2010.
Until mandatory disclosure laws are universally implemented
across the country, cybercriminals will implement encryption in more cases, due
to the obvious advantages encryption provides in committing cybercrimes.
No comments:
Post a Comment